Re: php professional

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: Tim Tassonis <timtas(at)cubic(dot)ch>
Cc: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: php professional
Date: 2007-02-22 16:00:47
Message-ID: 45DDBE2F.4080201@wildenhain.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


totally off topic,

Tim Tassonis schrieb:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> My definition is, "toy used/trumpeted by pseudo-professionals as a
>> professional tool, when it just doesn't measure up".
>
> Boah, here surely speaks a true professional playing in the league of
> Donald Knuth or even Alan Kay, as opposed to all the pseudos like me out
> there.
>
> Is it Assembler or Smalltalk you write your web pages with?

No, python, java ;)

> PHP absolutely is a professional tool as a scripting language, of course
> with all the downsides of any scripting language. I'll choose php over

Well no. PHP is not a professional language because it has no really
design - and that has nothing to do with the fact it beeing a scripting
language. Its a bad scripting language. (Say namespaces for example,
confusing function interfaces, unicode flaws, missing usable frameworks,
silly type handling, quoting hell)

> Perl any day, as it is syntactically much cleaner and performs
> sufficiently well for usual scripting needs.

ah... yes. Dont like perl either but its at least carrying some
actual language design.

> Of course, I wouldn't write an operating system with it.

Would you write a language with it? :-)

Btw, "professional programmers" can indeed use funny languages
- they are professional by they earning their living with it.

T.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-02-22 16:01:18 Re: Slony subscription problem
Previous Message Joris Dobbelsteen 2007-02-22 15:43:34 Re: Guarenteeing ordering constraints