Re: Column storage positions

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: Phil Currier <pcurrier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Column storage positions
Date: 2007-02-21 16:22:26
Message-ID: 45DC71C2.2090400@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Florian G. Pflug wrote:
>
> I think you'd want to have a flag per field that tell you if the user
> has overridden the storage pos for that specific field. Otherwise,
> the next time you have to chance to optimize the ordering, you might
> throw away changes that the admin has done on purpose. The same hold
> true for a pg_dump/pg_reload cycle. If none of the fields had their
> storage order changed manually, you'd want to reoder them optimally
> at dump/reload time. If, however, the admin specified an ordering, you'd
> want to preserve that.
>

I don't think users should be monkeying with the storage position at
all. Decisions about that should belong to the engine, not to users.
Providing a user tweakable knob for this strikes me as a large footgun,
as well as requiring all sorts of extra checks along the lines you are
talking of.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message José Orlando Pereira 2007-02-21 16:26:32 Re: Proposal: Commit timestamp
Previous Message José Orlando Pereira 2007-02-21 16:14:35 Re: Priorities for users or queries?