| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Date: | 2007-02-21 03:24:52 |
| Message-ID: | 45DBBB84.6030100@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
>
> It's not so big addition to the gram.y, see a list of commands
> http://mira.sai.msu.su/~megera/pgsql/ftsdoc/sql-commands.html.
> SQL commands make FTS syntax clear and follow tradition to manage
> system objects. From the user's side, I'd be very unhappy to configure
> FTS, which can be very complex, using functions. All we want is to
> provide users clear syntax.
This is like the third time we have been around this problem. The syntax
is clear and reasonable imo.
Can we stop arguing about it and just include? If there are specific
issues beyond syntax that is one
thing, but that this point it seems we are arguing for the sake of arguing.
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | August Zajonc | 2007-02-21 03:31:14 | Re: New feature request: FlashBack Query |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-21 01:08:18 | Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-02-21 03:33:03 | Re: [pgsql-patches] pltcl/plython fixes for spi_prepare types |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-21 01:45:15 | Re: [pgsql-patches] Patch to avoid gprofprofilingoverwrites |