Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes
Date: 2007-02-19 18:39:21
Message-ID: 45D9EED9.7020907@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
>>> Somehow this seems like implementing RAID within postgres,
>> RAID and LVM too. I can't get excited about re-inventing those
>> wheels when perfectly good implementations already exist for us to
>> sit on top of.
>
> I expect that someone will point out that Windows doesn't support RAID
> or LVM, and we'll have to reimplement it anyway.

windows supports software raid just fine since Windows 2000 or so ...

Stefan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-02-19 18:39:35 Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-02-19 18:34:55 Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes