| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates |
| Date: | 2007-02-16 15:32:47 |
| Message-ID: | 45D5CE9F.5010606@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian escribió:
>
>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew Dunstan escribi?:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Looks to me like the timestamptz test relies on the timestamp test (for
>>>> timestamp_tbl) but they are set to run in parallel, so we have a race
>>>> condition. Oops!
>>>>
>>> Good catch :-)
>>>
>>> I'd guess the answer is to move the tests using the timestamp_tbl to the
>>> timestamp test.
>>>
>> OK, will do. Thanks for the diagnosis.
>>
>
> Actually I have a patch ready for it.
>
>
Well, the first question is "which table should these tests actually be
using, and why?" Then they can be changed or moved as appropriate.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-16 15:35:26 | Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-02-16 15:11:27 | Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates |