| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: New features for pgbench |
| Date: | 2007-02-12 04:29:18 |
| Message-ID: | 45CFED1E.1020501@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 23:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, it isn't. This is *not* a candidate for back-porting.
>
> Why is that? It seems to me that the potential downside is essentially
> zero. This is a developer-oriented benchmark tool, after all.
To me, it is a clear line. Once we accept for one, we may accept for
another.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> -Neil
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2007-02-12 04:57:48 | Re: New features for pgbench |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2007-02-12 04:20:15 | Re: New features for pgbench |