| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches |
| Date: | 2007-02-02 17:29:00 |
| Message-ID: | 45C374DC.6080609@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>> But it's also important to point out that a number of community
>> members are on the hook to support old versions due to their day
>> jobs; with Tom/Red Hat/7.3 (or is it 7.4?) probably being the best
>> example. IIRC Sun's support policy is 5 years, so presumably someone
>> will have to maintain whatever version they initially shipped with
>> (8.1?) for quite some time as well.
>
> Right. and my original point in starting this thread is that it would
> be valuable to the community if all this information were gathered up
> and documented somewhere.
Go for it! :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-02-02 17:32:55 | Re: DBMS Engines and Performance |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-02-02 17:14:05 | Re: DBMS Engines and Performance |