| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib |
| Date: | 2007-01-28 22:47:26 |
| Message-ID: | 45BD27FE.4030409@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
>> I think it's necessary to get each in its own schema whether we have
>> an initdb flag or not.
>
> In any case, the initdb flag idea is about as much a nonstarter as the
> configure flag idea, for the same (packaging) reasons.
I don't see your point but it makes my life simpler. So do you opinions
on the schema idea?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2007-01-29 02:05:48 | Re: Function execution costs 'n all that |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-28 22:45:13 | Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib |