From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Problems with pgsql-announce |
Date: | 2007-01-12 08:39:58 |
Message-ID: | 45A7495E.7000102@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
> --On Monday, January 08, 2007 12:02:53 -0800 Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> Greg,
>
>>> Yeah, something weird is going on there. From looking at the moderation
>>> queue, it seems everyone is getting three or four duplicates. Maybe
>>> we can simply turn that off, Marc?
>> ... not if duplicates are actually being received; we don't want 3-4 or
>> each message.
>
> Right now, any duplicates are supposed to be shuffled to the moderators queue
> to deal with ... what the filter is *supposed* to deal with is spam, which
> tends to be alot of duplicates of the same message with different headers ...
Don't think I ever saw one in the queue. Plenty of bounces though...
> If I remove the duplicate altogether, I suspect that there won't be much change
> on the lists themselves, but I don't know for sure ...
It hasn't made any difference whatsoever to the slaves list, except that
we now get the reports we expect to see. I realise there's a difference
between that and other lists, but it does still get spam.
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2007-01-12 13:35:07 | Re: Problems with pgsql-announce |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-01-12 03:14:48 | Re: Problems with pgsql-announce |