From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] psql commandline conninfo |
Date: | 2006-12-17 20:28:12 |
Message-ID: | 4585A85C.7070500@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>
>> OK, good to know. Does the patch need documentation too?
>>
>
> Certainly.
>
That's why I haven't committed it yet. I intend to put info in the psql
manual as well as in the libpq reference.
>
>> Are we
>> deprecating the psql options now duplicated by the new functionality,
>> like host/port/username/password?
>>
>
> I'd vote not. This is just another way to do it.
>
>
>
I entirely agree. It lets you do some nice things that aren't obvious
now, like:
psql 'service=foo sslmode=require'
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2006-12-17 21:18:01 | Re: Security leak with trigger functions? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-17 19:08:13 | Re: [PATCHES] psql commandline conninfo |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Takayuki Tsunakawa | 2006-12-18 05:47:07 | Re: Load distributed checkpoint |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-12-17 19:08:13 | Re: [PATCHES] psql commandline conninfo |