Re: [HACKERS] Dynamic Tracing docs

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Dynamic Tracing docs
Date: 2006-12-04 13:47:45
Message-ID: 45742701.7010901@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Simon Riggs napsal(a):
> On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 09:43 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> Enclose new trace.sgml file as discussed on -docs.
>> I have a question here, regarding this:
>>
>> To include DTrace support in a 64-bit binary, specify --enable-dtrace
>> and DTRACEFLAGS="-64" to configure.
>>
>> The dtrace documentation says that dtrace automatically picks the right
>> build environment. Something is wrong here. Either the dtrace
>> documentation or ours.
>
> I didn't presume to question Robert's technical notes
> http://blogs.sun.com/robertlor/entry/user_level_dtrace_probes_in
>
> Robert, Can you throw any light on this? Or do you have any further
> comments on the docs?
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/dynamic-trace.html
>

I'm not dtrace guru, but I think that main reason for 64-bit flag is
that dtrace generates header file/code for probes during preprocessing
time and it don't know nothing about compiler switch. The probe code/
data structure is different on 32/64-bit.

However, if you run dtrace script that dtrace detects automatically
"build environment" (if binary is 32 or 64bits).

Robert, please correct me if I wrong.

Zdenek

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2006-12-04 13:55:39 Re: [HACKERS] elog(FATAL)ing non-existent roles during client
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-12-04 13:39:36 Source directory

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2006-12-04 13:55:39 Re: [HACKERS] elog(FATAL)ing non-existent roles during client
Previous Message Gavin Sherry 2006-12-04 13:21:49 Re: elog(FATAL)ing non-existent roles during client