| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007Marketing(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Integrating Replication into Core |
| Date: | 2006-11-22 19:46:45 |
| Message-ID: | 4564A925.9070407@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
>
>> But there's nothing wrong with
>> having SQL syntax for the replication.
>
> Okay. After reading the tsearch2 discussion I got another feeling, but
> that might just have been me.
>
The objection then was that about 8 or 9 new commands were proposed, and
that a functional interface might be just as good.
What sort of grammar support do you want?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-11-22 19:58:32 | Re: Integrating Replication into Core |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-22 19:39:03 | Re: Integrating Replication into Core |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-11-22 19:58:32 | Re: Integrating Replication into Core |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-11-22 19:39:03 | Re: Integrating Replication into Core |