Re: Statistics visibility in SERIALIZABLE transactions

From: Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Statistics visibility in SERIALIZABLE transactions
Date: 2006-11-21 09:39:04
Message-ID: 4562C938.20007@pws.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
>
>
>> Try looking at a table that was ALTERed since
>> your transaction began.)
>>
>
> Shouldn't the transaction fail, then?
>
>
Neil Conway and I opened this VERY BIG can of worms a couple of years
ago on hackers.

I can't find the references to it in the archives. I think I need to go
back more than the start of 2005. And I can't remember how to do that.
It was in relation to CLUSTER on a table and how previous transactions
would not use the correct view of the table.

I recall something to do with issues relating to reading the catalog
before transaction startup and problems with needing a transaction to
use the catalog.
My memory of it is fuzzy. If Neil or Tom remember the discussion they
may be able to post a link.

Sorry if this wasn't much help.

Russell Smith

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2006-11-21 10:09:40 Re: XA support (distributed transactions)
Previous Message Danny Milosavljevic 2006-11-21 09:12:04 Re: XA support (distributed transactions)