Re: Postgres derived databases

From: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres derived databases
Date: 2006-10-30 21:11:17
Message-ID: 45466A75.6000301@pooteeweet.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>> It might make sense to add this to the about section of the main site
>> [2]. Its sort of marketing-ish I would say
>
> Yes, it's marketing the other guys. Why would we want to do that?

I put it on techdocs as per Josh's comment.

As for why we should have this:
It makes it clear that underneath all of these marketing supported
databases runs good old PostgreSQL. Also the fact that PostgreSQL has
this lively ecosystem makes it clear that its not going to go away like
MySQL could if it got bought.

regards,
Lukas

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2006-10-30 21:13:52 Re: On what we want to support: travel?
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2006-10-30 21:04:33 Re: On what we want to support: travel?