Re: COPY does not work with regproc and aclitem

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: COPY does not work with regproc and aclitem
Date: 2006-10-23 20:16:36
Message-ID: 453D2324.2090901@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Hmm, maybe it should be using regprocedure instead?
>
> Not unless you want to break initdb. The only reason regproc still
> exists, really, is to accommodate loading of pg_type during initdb.
> Guess what: we can't do type lookup at that point.

Do you mean something like this:

Datum
regprocout(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{

...

if( donot_resolve_procname == TRUE)
{
result = (char *) palloc(NAMEDATALEN);
snprintf(result, NAMEDATALEN, "%u", proid);
}

...

PG_RETURN_CSTRING(result);
}

donot_resolve_procname will be set when COPY will be performed.

Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-10-23 20:17:55 Re: COPY does not work with regproc and aclitem
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-10-23 20:13:22 Re: COPY does not work with regproc and aclitem

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-10-23 20:17:55 Re: COPY does not work with regproc and aclitem
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-10-23 20:13:22 Re: COPY does not work with regproc and aclitem