Re: Is ODBC that slow?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Subject: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
Date: 2006-10-21 03:40:12
Message-ID: 4539969C.6070306@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


>> Try Command Prompt's ODBC driver. Lately it has been measured to be
>> consistently faster than psqlODBC.
>>
>> http://projects.commandprompt.com/public/odbcng
>
> just curious: what was the reasoning to reimplement the protocol stack
> in odbcng? the mainline odbc driver went in the other direction.

We wanted to be able to offer some options that we couldn't if based
around libpq.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> carlo: please, please, get your mail server to quit telling me your
> mailbox is full :)
>
> merlin
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-21 05:02:06 Re: VACUUM Performance
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-21 03:39:17 Re: Is ODBC that slow?