Re: full disjunction in press kit for 8.2

From: "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: "Harald Armin Massa" <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: full disjunction in press kit for 8.2
Date: 2006-10-15 22:15:34
Message-ID: 45327AC6.29149.CAB0011@dan.langille.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 15 Oct 2006 at 23:20, Harald Armin Massa wrote:

> >
> > I wanted to
> > include a mention of the Full Disjunctions project because it bolsters our
> > claim to "the most advanced open source database", even though it won't be
> > ready for inclusion into the core code until at least v8.3.
> >
>
> That is a noble idea, Josh; and I think it really fits. I tried to follow
> that Full Disjunctions threads and discussions, but up to today I still do
> not know what a Full Disjunction really is.
>
> Is there anything more than the allready mentioned Web Link with that short
> abstract, that FD is good for Webservices (200points for
> BuzzWordCompatibilitie); but some simple example with 2 tables who are full
> disjunctioned would be very very helpfull.
>
> Has anyone a hint? (yes. I googled it)

http://code.google.com/soc/pgsql/appinfo.html?csaid=34B13296DE039A78

It looks to be useful for circular references.

--
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-10-16 04:03:15 Re: PostgreSQL rebranding
Previous Message Shane Ambler 2006-10-15 21:54:14 Re: full disjunction in press kit for 8.2