Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "H(dot)J(dot) Sanders" <hjs(at)rmax(dot)nl>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly?
Date: 2006-10-12 22:26:34
Message-ID: 452EC11A.2030703@paradise.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jim C. Nasby wrote:

>
> Ok, now that I've actually looked at the release notes, I take that back
> and apologize. But while there's a lot of improvements that have been
> made, there's still some seriously tough problems that have been talked
> about for a long time and there's still no "light at the end of the
> tunnel", like how to handle multi-column statistics.

Yeah - multi-column stats and cost/stats for functions look the the next
feature additions we need to get going on....

Cheers

Mark

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2006-10-12 22:41:00 Re: Hints proposal
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2006-10-12 22:15:03 Re: Hints proposal