Re: Database Auditing

From: Marco Serantoni <m(dot)serantoni(at)caltanet(dot)it>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Database Auditing
Date: 2006-10-12 07:05:04
Message-ID: 452DE920.9080401@caltanet.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


>> I'm evaluating of use postgresql but for local law requirements is
>> needed for the access of some kind of data (sensitive) a log of the
>> accesses (Auditing) is a feature available in many databases but i've
>> seen that lacks in PostgreSQL, there are already plans to implement it
>> or patches already submitted ?
>> If not both could someone give me some hints on how do it
> we can probably come up with something. can you please give specific
> requirements about what type of information you have to keep track of?
username, date and statement executed and optionally the IP.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-10-12 08:49:42 Re: UTF-8
Previous Message Chris Mair 2006-10-12 06:16:37 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2006-10-12 07:51:11 Re: Patch for Win32 blocking problem
Previous Message Florian Weimer 2006-10-12 06:34:45 Re: Index Tuning Features