Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hints WAS: Index Tuning Features
Date: 2006-10-11 23:33:22
Message-ID: 452D7F42.1040302@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>
>> Since you're the one who wants hints, that's kind of up to you to define.
>> Write a specification and make a proposal.
>>
>
> What is the point of writing a proposal if there is a threat of "will be
> rejected" if one of the people who would do the rejection doesn't at least
> outline what would be acceptable?

Oh come on Mark, you have been here long enough to know how this works.
You define what you would like to see and submit it for feedback.
-Hackers submit feedback, you refine and the cyle continues till either
-hackers determine it just isn't going to happen (packages), the would
be hacker gives up, or a workable plan comes out of the discussion.

Joshua D. Drake

>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-11 23:45:13 Re: Index Tuning Features
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2006-10-11 23:30:56 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD