| From: | Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch |
| Date: | 2006-10-10 11:07:37 |
| Message-ID: | 452B7EF9.5070500@sun.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Sorry for the delayed response.
Robert Treat wrote:
>Looking through -patches I don't see the doc patch, and outside of
>installation.sgml there doesn't seem to be anything either. Robert, are you
>still on the hook for these?
>
Josh will help submit the doc patch. I have documented the usage
instructions in a couple of places but just have been too busy to get
the patch submitted. My bad.
http://pgfoundry.org/docman/?group_id=1000163
http://blogs.sun.com/robertlor
>Also should installation.sgml mention the
>issues with building 32 vs 64 bit binaries and/or the issue with static
>functions?
>
>
There are no issues with building 32 and 64 bit binaries. The above doc
explains the issue with static function.
Regards,
-Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Lor | 2006-10-10 11:13:49 | Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2006-10-10 10:30:07 | Re: Test of 8.2beta1 fails |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Lor | 2006-10-10 11:13:49 | Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-10-10 10:29:26 | Re: test: please ignore |