Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types

From: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types
Date: 2006-10-06 08:34:20
Message-ID: 4526150C.3030305@logix-tt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, Tom,

Tom Lane wrote:

> One issue is what to do with procedural languages and large objects,
> which don't have any associated schema. If we treat them as being
> outside all schemas, we'd have semantics like this: dump the PLs and
> blobs unless one or more --schema switches appeared. Is that OK?

Sounds fine.

Is there a possibility to dump only those objects? Maybe --large-objects
and --languages?

Thanks,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2006-10-06 09:15:11 Re: Win XP SP2 SMP locking (8.1.4)
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2006-10-06 07:47:45 Re: continuing daily testing of dbt2 against postgresql