Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i

From: Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i
Date: 2006-09-25 07:48:16
Message-ID: 451789C0.4050003@logix-tt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Hi, Hannu,

Hannu Krosing wrote:

>>> Are you sure it's UCS-4 ? I've always thought that XML is what is given
>>> in <xml > tag, and utf-8 if no charset is given.
>> You have to distinguish between the supported charset, and the document
>> encoding.
> UCS-4 and UTF-8 are both encodings for UNICODE
> see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-32

Yes, I know.

The Point I wanted to make was that the document encoding is independent
from the allowed charset (except having to be a subset).

That is what XML entities were defined for.

So even in an document using LATIN-1 as encoding, the charset still is
Unicode, giving us the possibility to use &entities; to use non-latin1
characters.

HTH,
Markus

--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schaber 2006-09-25 08:02:59 Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-09-25 05:43:03 Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schaber 2006-09-25 08:02:59 Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i
Previous Message Jean-Paul Argudo 2006-09-25 07:29:28 Two proposals of DBA helper functions