| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: OID conflicts |
| Date: | 2006-09-18 16:52:18 |
| Message-ID: | 450ECEC2.4050701@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gevik Babakhani wrote:
>> Actually, it would be nice to be able to reserve some. It would help
>> stop patch bitrot. I know Tom Dunstan wanted to do just that while he
>> was working on the enums patch.
>>
>>
>
> Yes it would be very. If Tom Dunstan decided not to do that I would like
> build such a thing.
>
>
You misunderstood me. I meant he wanted to make use of such a facility,
not that he wanted to build it.
By all means float ideas on this - the problem seems to me to be
ensuring that reservations are time limited, but no doubt Tom Lane and
Bruce will have opinions ...
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2006-09-18 17:21:40 | Re: Limited Sort |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-09-18 16:23:36 | Re: UUID/GUID discussion leading to request for hexstring bytea? |