Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected
Date: 2006-09-17 00:44:48
Message-ID: 450C9A80.2050708@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:46:04PM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
>> Yes. What's pretty large? We've had to redefine large recently, now we're
>> talking about systems with between 100TB and 1,000TB.
>
> Do you actually have PostgreSQL databases in that size range?

No, they have databases in MPP that are that large :)

Joshua D. Drake

>
> /* Steinar */

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Milen Kulev 2006-09-17 22:12:33 Partition elimination problem
Previous Message Steinar H. Gunderson 2006-09-17 00:08:43 Re: RAID 0 not as fast as expected