From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: @ versus ~, redux |
Date: | 2006-09-03 17:48:48 |
Message-ID: | 44FB1580.5040001@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I can see various things that we might consider doing:
>
> 1. Just flip the names of the two operators added by the GIN patch.
>
> 2. #1 plus flip the names of the various contrib operators that are
> out of sync (Michael Fuhr points out that contrib/intarray is out
> of step too ... are there others?).
>
> 3. Leave the existing op names as-is in core and contrib, but consider
> them deprecated and add new ops with consistently-chosen names.
> (The new ops introduced by GIN should only exist with the new names.)
>
> #1 isn't doing anything towards solving the underlying problem.
> #2 has got obvious backwards-compatibility issues for contrib users.
+1 on #2 with the following caveat. When we publish the release notes,
we have a specific section that says:
Compatibility changes from previous releases. Which IMHO should be there
anyway as there are always compatibility issues from release to release.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2006-09-03 18:13:11 | Re: @ versus ~, redux |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-03 17:35:39 | @ versus ~, redux |