Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Would it be worthwhile to add a switch so that the foreign key test is
>> only used "if" they use the switch in conjunction with a -i?
> I wouldn't object to providing that as a (non default) option.
O.k. I will take a look at what that would take..
> The int8 change should be unnecessary in view of Tatsuo's recent fix
> to make the random deltas symmetrical about zero.
O.k. that may be the case, my testing was with the 8.1 version pgbench.
I will verify with -HEAD before I change the int8.
> I would counsel
> against making the other changes either, as they seem to accomplish
> little except make the comparability of results more doubtful.
I am not interested in really changing the overall internals. I just
wanted the foreign key option.
Joshua D. Drake
> regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-08-24 03:19:30|
|Subject: Re: seahorse again failing |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-08-24 02:46:18|
|Subject: Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build |
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2006-08-24 03:50:47|
|Subject: Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors)|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-08-24 02:40:35|
|Subject: Re: Some minor changes to pgbench |