Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> It's fairly clear that we could support concurrent builds of nonunique
>>> indexes, but is that enough of a use-case to justify it?
>
>> I believe there would be. Most PostgreSQL users I run into, develop in
>> production, which means being able to add an index they forgot when
>> doing query analysis.
>
> True, unique constraints are usually something you should get right to
> start with. But it'll be annoying if we can do everything BUT that :-(

Agreed, but better then nothing :).

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/