Re: Queries joining views

From: Alban Hertroys <alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl>
To: Alban Hertroys <alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, DelGurth <delgurth(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Queries joining views
Date: 2006-08-22 10:30:13
Message-ID: 44EADCB5.9020401@magproductions.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Alban Hertroys wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm thinking that removing the indexes it's erroneously using now could
> help performance, as it can no longer use that index. It may however
> pick the primary key index (likely), or - if we remove even that one - a
> sequential scan... Experimenting will answer that.

Well, look at the attachhed explain output of:

zorgweb_solaris=> BEGIN;
DROP INDEX mm_insrel_full_idx; DROP INDEX mm_insrel_relation_idx;
EXPLAIN ANALYZE
SELECT
insrel.rnumber,insrel.dnumber,insrel.snumber,insrel.dir,insrel.number,medical_care_container.number,product.number
FROM mm_medical_care_container medical_care_container,
mm_insrel insrel,
mm_product product
WHERE medical_care_container.number=558332
AND (medical_care_container.number=insrel.dnumber
AND product.number=insrel.snumber AND insrel.dir<>1);
ROLLBACK;

Only 13ms as opposed to 130-ish :)

--
Alban Hertroys
alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl

magproductions b.v.

T: ++31(0)534346874
F: ++31(0)534346876
M:
I: www.magproductions.nl
A: Postbus 416
7500 AK Enschede

// Integrate Your World //

Attachment Content-Type Size
explain_plan.txt text/plain 2.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Serodio 2006-08-22 11:38:16 varchar(n) vs. varchar
Previous Message Alban Hertroys 2006-08-22 10:16:53 Re: Queries joining views

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-22 12:05:07 Re: Open 8.2 items
Previous Message Alban Hertroys 2006-08-22 10:16:53 Re: Queries joining views