Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tzahi Fadida <Tzahi(dot)ML(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Adding fulldisjunctions to the contrib
Date: 2006-08-14 00:02:42
Message-ID: 44DFBDA2.5080304@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Josh Berkus wrote:
> I'll admit that I had hopes for it for PR reasons, which
> is not usually why we make decisions. It would be cool to be the first
> database system to ship with any implementation of Full Disjunctions, and
> I can't announce that if it's on pgFoundry.
>
>

I don't see that having it on pgfoundry makes it less announceable. But
if/when we get support at the SQL level, then we'll *really* have
something worth announcing.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yoshiyuki Asaba 2006-08-14 01:31:01 Re: [HACKERS] SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-13 23:47:12 Re: [PATCHES] Custom variable class segmentation fault

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yoshiyuki Asaba 2006-08-14 01:31:01 Re: [HACKERS] SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-13 23:47:12 Re: [PATCHES] Custom variable class segmentation fault