Re: 8.2 features status

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-11 00:34:58
Message-ID: 44DBD0B2.3080501@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>> First, +1 on Josh B.'s point about trying out Trac, since it's
>> already up and running. Josh D., can you just turn that on? (BTW, is
>> trac linked off http://commandprompt.com anywhere? I had to google to
>> find it yesterday...)

Oh and answer Jim's question. No isn't linked of www.cmd... why? I have
no idea ;) It should be on our /community page.

>
> I just noticed that the code repository on that Trac is broken in more
> ways than I had realized. For starters it doesn't seem to have the 8.1
> branch or tags (apparently it's out of date).
>
> Doesn't Trac have a CVS plugin? It will just cause confusion to have a
> SVN repo that doesn't reflect reality -- which it wouldn't even if it
> weren't broken.
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2006-08-11 00:49:53 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-08-11 00:33:35 Re: 8.2 features status