Re: 8.2 features status

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-04 17:27:49
Message-ID: 44D38395.5060006@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Luke Lonergan" <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> writes:
>
>>UPDATE/DELETE for CE are a big deal - I really wish we had INSERT too,
>
> Huh? We had INSERT working before, that's why it's not mentioned.

I think what Luke means, is that an INSERT into the base table of the
inheritance hierarchy with CE enabled gets automagically inserted into
the correct partition, and as far as I know that still doesn't happen --
but I've certainly been wrong before :-).

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-08-04 17:30:57 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2006-08-04 17:16:24 Re: 8.2 features status