Re: [PATCHES] Replication Documentation

From: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Replication Documentation
Date: 2006-08-02 13:07:03
Message-ID: 44D0A377.7080706@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Hi,

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The idea being to define issues like multi/single master, async vs,
> sync, and mention the projects which are in each category.

You could even add shared-nothing vs. shared-disk nodes.

Generally I'd say it makes sense to 'educate' people, but does it really
make sense to explain all that if there is no replication solution for
most of these combinations?

I'd vote for an external (not in the documentation) information site
about replication solutions. There we can put all the information we see
fit (even 'journalistic' ones).

I might change my mind once we have multiple replication solutions
covering most situations. ;-)

I like what and how Chris wrote [1] - an overview over existing and
upcomming replication solutions.

Regards

Markus

[1]: I can't find Chris' original message. My answer to it is in the
archives, but not the original message. Why is that? (Thread view says
'message not available'). My answer contains Chris' text, though:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2006-07/msg00019.php

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schiltknecht 2006-08-02 13:28:25 Re: Replication Documentation
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-02 12:38:13 Re: DROP/IF_P EXISTS in gram.y

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schiltknecht 2006-08-02 13:28:25 Re: Replication Documentation
Previous Message Adrian Maier 2006-08-02 06:59:28 Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)