Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Adrian Maier <adrian(dot)maier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)
Date: 2006-08-01 14:57:29
Message-ID: 44CF6BD9.8020004@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Would this do the trick?
>>
>
> I think Bruce changed the call convention for run_diff ... are you
> looking at CVS tip? Otherwise it looks reasonable.
>
>

You're right. I had forgotten to do a cvs update. Fixed and committed.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-08-01 15:20:14 Re: Temporary Tables
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2006-08-01 14:55:35 Re: Hash indexes (was: On-disk bitmap index patch)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-08-01 17:37:48 Re: New variable server_version_num
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-01 14:35:57 Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)