Re: GUC with units, details

From: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, "Bort, Paul" <pbort(at)tmwsystems(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUC with units, details
Date: 2006-07-27 16:04:16
Message-ID: 44C8E400.1050906@phlo.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Florian G. Pflug wrote:
>> Rounding up would have the advantage that you could just specify "0"
>> in the config file, and have postgres use the smallest value
>> possible.
>
> In most algebras, dividing zero by something is still zero, so there'd
> be no need to round anything.

I guess a clicked the "send" button a little too fast. You're right, of course.

greetings, Florian Pflug

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Csaba Nagy 2006-07-27 16:07:23 Re: GUC with units, details
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2006-07-27 15:59:35 Hash indexes (was: On-disk bitmap index patch)