Re: pgsql vs mysql

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "howachen(at)gmail(dot)com" <howachen(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql vs mysql
Date: 2006-07-11 17:23:55
Message-ID: 44B3DEAB.9050302@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 7/11/2006 1:08 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:

> On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 11:04, Jan Wieck wrote:
>> On 6/30/2006 1:07 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>>
>> > * mysql has a few features here and there which are nice...just to
>> > name a few, flush tables with lock, multiple insert, etc
>
>> The multiple insert stuff is not only non-standard, it also encourages
>> the bad practice of using literal values directly in the SQL string
>> versus prepared statements with place holders.
>
> I thought it was in the SQL 99 standard...

The SQL bible doesn't say SQL99, it says it is a DB2 specific feature.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ed L. 2006-07-11 17:30:27 troubleshooting 8.1.2
Previous Message Paul Tilles 2006-07-11 17:11:16 doesn't recognize "!=-" (not equal to a negative value)