Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?
Date: 2006-06-22 13:05:41
Message-ID: 449A95A5.6080302@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page wrote:

>
>As a sidenote on the postgres/postmaster merge subject though - Magnus &
>I were wondering if Peter's change means we no longer need to ship
>postmaster.exe and postgres.exe with pgInstaller. Presumably we can just
>use postgres.exe for everything now?
>
>
>
>

Won't we still need to know if we are called as postmaster or postgres?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-06-22 13:12:55 Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?)
Previous Message David Roussel 2006-06-22 13:03:47 Re: [HACKERS] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL