Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Peter Mount (Home)" <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Date: 2000-05-02 17:27:42
Message-ID: 4496.957288462@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Relevant question: how well does the JDBC code that's in CVS now
>> work with 7.0? If the answer is "hardly at all" then a new driver
>> is probably better even if it has lurking bugs. If the answer is
>> "pretty well" then again I'd be inclined to ship what we've got.

> As far as I know, no one has it yet, except Thomas. The driver must
> have a domain of org.postgresql or it is the old version. Only since I
> installed Peter's Makefile last week did it become install-able.

So the version currently in CVS has seen hardly any testing either?
Man, you really know how to make a guy feel comfortable :-(

Given that, we might as well let Peter have the extra day or two
to bring the CVS version to the best state he can.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-02 17:37:43 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Previous Message Karel Zak 2000-05-02 17:23:38 Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-02 17:37:43 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-02 16:43:03 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status