From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Peter Mount (Home)" <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
Date: | 2000-05-02 17:27:42 |
Message-ID: | 4496.957288462@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Relevant question: how well does the JDBC code that's in CVS now
>> work with 7.0? If the answer is "hardly at all" then a new driver
>> is probably better even if it has lurking bugs. If the answer is
>> "pretty well" then again I'd be inclined to ship what we've got.
> As far as I know, no one has it yet, except Thomas. The driver must
> have a domain of org.postgresql or it is the old version. Only since I
> installed Peter's Makefile last week did it become install-able.
So the version currently in CVS has seen hardly any testing either?
Man, you really know how to make a guy feel comfortable :-(
Given that, we might as well let Peter have the extra day or two
to bring the CVS version to the best state he can.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-02 17:37:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
Previous Message | Karel Zak | 2000-05-02 17:23:38 | Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-02 17:37:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-02 16:43:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |