| From: | Ruben Rubio Rey <ruben(at)rentalia(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guido Neitzer <guido(dot)neitzer(at)pharmaline(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved? |
| Date: | 2006-06-13 08:17:08 |
| Message-ID: | 448E7484.2020100@rentalia.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Guido Neitzer wrote:
> On 13.06.2006, at 8:44 Uhr, Ruben Rubio Rey wrote:
>
>> Tonight database has been vacumm full and reindex (all nights
>> database do it)
>>
>> Now its working fine. Speed is as spected. I ll be watching that sql
>> ...
>> Maybe the problem exists when database is busy, or maybe its solved ...
>
>
> Depending on the usage pattern the nightly re-index / vacuum analyse
> is suboptimal. If you have high insert/update traffic your
> performance will decrease over the day and will only be good in the
> morning hours and I hope this is not what you intend to have.
>
> Autovacuum is the way to go, if you have "changing content". Perhaps
> combined with vacuum analyse in a nightly or weekly schedule. We do
> this weekly.
>
> cug
>
>
I ll configure autovacum. I ll write if problem is solved.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nis Jorgensen | 2006-06-13 08:40:20 | Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit performance ... backwards? |
| Previous Message | Guido Neitzer | 2006-06-13 08:11:23 | Re: Posrgres speed problem - solved? |