Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(),

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(),
Date: 2006-06-12 02:40:45
Message-ID: 448CD42D.1040903@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> If all you want is column, datatype, why not just use info_schema, or
>>> newsysviews? Or even the base catalogs?
>
>> Where do I look in the info_schema? How do I know exactly what I need?
>> What is newsysviews?
>
> Exactly the same arguments can be made against any new functions we
> invent. OTOH, I do not think these arguments apply to selecting from
> information_schema; that is SQL standard, and if someone doesn't know
> what to do with it I don't think it's our fault.

I am not blaming us :).

I am just saying that certain functions can make life easier.

What is easier?

test=# select column_name, data_type from columns where table_schema !=
'pg_catalog' and table_name = 'email';
column_name | data_type
-------------+-----------
score | real

Or:

select pg_get_user_tabledesc(email);

This is the basis of my argument. I don't really have anything to add.

:)

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-06-12 02:41:15 Re: TODO: Add pg_get_acldef(), pg_get_typedefault(), pg_get_attrdef(),
Previous Message Kris Kennaway 2006-06-12 02:07:54 Re: postgresql and process titles