Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: Riccardo Inverni <riccardo(dot)inverni(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?
Date: 2006-05-30 22:22:08
Message-ID: 447CC590.4070305@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 16:28, Riccardo Inverni wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I have to update a Linux box with PostgreSQL on it, essentially for
>> data warehousing purposes. I had set it up about 3 years ago and at
>> that time the best solution I had been recommended was to use SCSI
>> disks with hardware RAID controllers.
>>
>> Is this still the way to go or things have recently changed? Any
>> other suggestion/advice? What about SAN?
>
> Actually, modern SATA server drives are now considered competitive with
> the proper RAID controller.

And for a DW application they are the most megabyte per dollar you can by.

>
> Nowadays most people seem to recommend the Areca controllers. I haven't
> used them myself, but would be happy to test them some day.

I have heard good things about the Areca, but I have never used them. I
have had excellent luck with the LSI controllers however.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Broussard 2006-05-31 01:07:11 Re: [HACKERS] Schema Limitations ?
Previous Message Ben 2006-05-30 21:54:39 Re: SCSI disk: still the way to go?