Re: Vector type (Re: challenging constraint situation -

From: Alban Hertroys <alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vector type (Re: challenging constraint situation -
Date: 2006-05-26 14:04:27
Message-ID: 44770AEB.301@magproductions.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alban Hertroys <alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl> writes:
>>With what I have in mind, both overlap and equality would violate the
>>unique constraint. I don't quite see why someone'd want to forbid
>>overlap but to allow equality; isn't not allowing equality the whole
>>point of a unique constraint?
>
> You're missing the point. Letting "~" represent the operator that
> tests for interval-overlap, we can have
> A --------------
> B ------------------

I'd say "unique constraint violation" right here (provided there's a
unique constraint on this column, of course). The order in which these
are inserted/updated doesn't seem to matter either. I'm afraid I'm still
missing the point... or maybe I'm not wrong???

> C ----------------
> so that A ~ B and B ~ C but not A ~ C. This is too much unlike normal
> equality for a btree to work with "~" as the "equality" operator.

--
Alban Hertroys
alban(at)magproductions(dot)nl

magproductions b.v.

T: ++31(0)534346874
F: ++31(0)534346876
M:
I: www.magproductions.nl
A: Postbus 416
7500 AK Enschede

// Integrate Your World //

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-05-26 14:07:39 Re: Vector type (Re: challenging constraint situation - how do I make it)
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-05-26 13:59:43 Re: "make check" fails over NFS or tmpfs