Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked

From: Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
To: operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked
Date: 2006-05-24 21:10:45
Message-ID: 4474CBD5.5050901@ca.afilias.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

operationsengineer1(at)yahoo(dot)com wrote:
> http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/23/2228225
>
> here is an interesting thread regarding speed
> issues...
>
> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=186493&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=15391068
>
> bottom line - some real life users have compared pgsql
> to mysql in *some* cases and pgsql was faster.

You can design easily design test cases that will show one database to
be faster than the other. Fact is, most of those "Database A is faster
than Database B" shoot out articles are written by people who don't
understand databases. As for a lot of the people who talk about
databases on Slashdot, well, I won't go there.

Most of these comparisons use base, untuned configurations, do a trivial
set of operations, and jump to conclusions about which database is faster.

MySQL is faster than Postgres in some cases. That doesn't make MySQL a
faster database than Postgres, it just makes it faster in some cases.
Try hitting MySQL with a highly concurrent load and see what happens.

--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message operationsengineer1 2006-05-24 22:06:53 SQL Question
Previous Message operationsengineer1 2006-05-24 19:57:15 Re: PostgreSQL Update + (PGISDBRU) PGSQL is Slow Debunked by Real Users