| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Date: | 2006-05-18 19:04:12 |
| Message-ID: | 446CC52C.7000502@tada.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
John DeSoi wrote:
>
> Right, you'll definitely need to hack the C source code to force
> PostgreSQL to accept invalid dates ;)
>
> http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html#1_14
>
Couldn't we just install something that replaced invalid dates with a randomly generated but
otherwise correct dates? That way they would become completely invisible. No one could even
tell that the date was invalid to start with.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-18 19:11:09 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-18 18:58:11 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-18 19:11:09 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Previous Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-18 18:58:11 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |