| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Date: | 2006-05-18 18:41:47 |
| Message-ID: | 446CBFEB.3030709@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Maybe a compatability layer isn't worth doing, but I certainly think
> it's very much worthwhile for the community to do everything possible to
> encourage migration from MySQL. We should be able to lay claim to most
> advanced and most popular OSS database.
>
We'll do that by concentrating on spiffy features, not compatibility
layers. I want people to use PostgreSQL because it's the best, not
because it's just like something else.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-18 18:58:11 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2006-05-18 18:41:06 | Re: BOF for OSCON? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Woodward | 2006-05-18 18:58:11 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2006-05-18 18:40:52 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |