Re: Slow C Function

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Adam Palmblad <adam(at)terapeak(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slow C Function
Date: 2006-05-09 23:09:19
Message-ID: 4461211F.8020300@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Adam Palmblad wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We've got a C function that we use here and we find that for every
> connection, the first run of the function is much slower than any
> subsequent runs. ( 50ms compared to 8ms)

That is fairly standard because the data will be cached.

>
> Besides using connection pooling, are there any options to improve
> performance?

Not that I know of but then again I am not a C programer.

>
> By the way, we are using pg version 8.1.3.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig A. James 2006-05-10 00:38:17 Postgres gets stuck
Previous Message Adam Palmblad 2006-05-09 21:57:09 Slow C Function