| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Pgsql-Performance ((E-mail))" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid |
| Date: | 2006-05-09 18:26:28 |
| Message-ID: | 4460DED4.2090103@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
> You're not suggesting that a hardware RAID controller will protect
> you against drives that lie about sync, are you?
Of course not, but which drives lie about sync that are SATA? Or more
specifically SATA-II?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Just Someone | 2006-05-09 18:26:34 | A better AND query? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-09 18:25:27 | Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2006-05-09 18:34:31 | Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-09 18:25:27 | Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid |