Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention

From: Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gavin Hamill <gdh(at)acentral(dot)co(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention
Date: 2006-04-24 16:29:11
Message-ID: 444CFCD7.1060403@osdl.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 13:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I've been looking into Gavin Hamill's recent report of poor performance
>>> with PG 8.1 on an 8-way IBM PPC64 box.
>
> Keep in mind that Gavin's 8-way turns back into a pumpkin on Monday :-(

I have a 4-way dual-core POWER5 system available...

Mark

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-04-24 16:37:38 Re: Unresolved Win32 bug reports
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-04-24 16:06:02 Re: bug# 2073 - Clarification