Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec

From: Miguel <mmiranda(at)123(dot)com(dot)sv>
To: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB & Adaptec
Date: 2006-03-20 21:12:37
Message-ID: 441F1AC5.9050700@123.com.sv
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Luke Lonergan wrote:

>Miguel,
>
>On 3/20/06 12:52 PM, "Miguel" <mmiranda(at)123(dot)com(dot)sv> wrote:
>
>
>
>>i have a HP dl380 g3 with array 5i controlled (1+0), these are my results
>>
>>
>
>Another "known bad" RAID controller. The Smartarray 5i is horrible on Linux
>- this is the first BSD result I've seen.
>
>
>
>>Seek times:
>> Full stroke: 250 iter in 1.138232 sec = 4.553 msec
>> Half stroke: 250 iter in 1.084474 sec = 4.338 msec
>>
>>
>
>These seem OK - are they "access times" or are they actually "seek times"?
>
>
i dont know, how can i check?

>Transfer rates:
> outside: 102400 kbytes in 2.075984 sec = 49326 kbytes/sec
> middle: 102400 kbytes in 2.100510 sec = 48750 kbytes/sec
> inside: 102400 kbytes in 2.042313 sec = 50139 kbytes/sec
>
>
>is this good enough?
>It's pretty slow. How many disk drives do you have?
>
>
>
>
I have 6 ultra a320 72G 10k discs

---
Miguel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2006-03-20 21:17:09 Re: Migration study, step 1: bulk write performance
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2006-03-20 20:59:13 Re: Best OS & Configuration for Dual Xeon w/4GB &