Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
Date: 2006-06-14 22:15:34
Message-ID: 4416.1150323334@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Thread added to TODO:
> o Properly mark all libpq-exported functions with "PQ"

Is that still relevant? I thought we'd done as much as we intended
to do in that specific direction. What would make sense to work on
is making the build step that strips not-officially-exported symbols
work on more platforms.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-06-14 22:18:22 Re: libpq's pollution of application namespace
Previous Message Greg Stark 2006-06-14 22:12:27 Re: postgresql and process titles